Risk of death in the pediatric intensive care unit: Prism score
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61651/rped.2008v61n1p01-07Keywords:
Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, Health Status Indicators, Patient AcuityAbstract
Objective: We performed a study to compare the performance of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and PRISM score in two periods. Material and methods: PRISM score was prospectively registered during 10 months in children admitted to the PICU of National Child Health Institute. Observed and expected deaths were analyzed to evaluate the performance of the PICU and PRISM score. Then we compared this performance with that of a previous study in the same PICU. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Results: There were 243 patients, 122 male, 121 female. Median age was 13 months (0.02 – 207) and median stay was 7 days. Demographics of population study was similar to the previous one, but PRISM score was lower (11.3 vs. 14.7, p < 0.001), due to a lower frequency of children with higher risk intervals. Mortality was lower in the present study (21% vs. 26.1%), but standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was higher (1.38 vs. 1.26). There were important discrepancies between observed and expected mortality ratios in the different risk intervals of the PRISM score. Conclusions: Compared with the previous study, the performance of PRISM score was poor, and the SMR of the PICU increased.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors will retain the copyright and grant the right to publish their work in the journal while allowing third parties to share it under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Articles are published under a Creative Commons license that allows sharing and adaptation with appropriate credit. CC BY 4.0 license. Available in English at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Authors may use other information disclosure formats as long as the initial publication in the journal is cited. The dissemination of the work through the Internet is recommended to increase citations and promote academic exchanges.
The published content does not necessarily reflect the specific point of view of the journal, and the authors assume full responsibility for the content of their article.