Validity and reliability of Yale Brown’s scale version children and teenagers (cy-bocs) in Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61651/rped.2008v61n1p68-75Keywords:
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, AdolescentAbstract
Objective: To validate Yale Brown Scale children and adolescents version (CY- BOCS) in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) in peruvian children and adolescents. Method: 46 children and adolescents with OCD diagnosis (29 male and 17 female, between 9 and 18 years old) were evaluated using CY-BOCS. All 46 patients were tasted twice (test and retest) and the interviews were recorded in order to be scored by two examiners. The scale reliably was determined evaluating the correlation inter-examiner, correlation test-retest and the internal consistence. Results: The total scale reliably was high; the coefficient of correlation inter-examiner of Person was 95% for the test and 97% for the retest and, 90% for correlation test-retest. Obsessions reliably were 93% and 96% for the retest, and the test compulsions reliably were 97% and 96% in the retest. Internal consistence was very good, 87% for 10 items. The test validity was 89% (test) and 83% (retest). Conclusion: CY-BOCS scale has a high reliably and validity and, it is an indispensable instrument for OCD children and adolescents following and evaluation.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors will retain the copyright and grant the right to publish their work in the journal while allowing third parties to share it under the Creative Commons Attribution license.
Articles are published under a Creative Commons license that allows sharing and adaptation with appropriate credit. CC BY 4.0 license. Available in English at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Authors may use other information disclosure formats as long as the initial publication in the journal is cited. The dissemination of the work through the Internet is recommended to increase citations and promote academic exchanges.
The published content does not necessarily reflect the specific point of view of the journal, and the authors assume full responsibility for the content of their article.